-
Yes We Cannon!
Join the Movement and Spread the Word
Recent Articles
- Lessons From Ottawa for a More Bikeable Hamiltonby Justin Jones, published May 24, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (0 comments)
- City to Install Permanent Bumpouts at Herkimer and Lockeby Graham McNally, published May 23, 2013 in Special Report: Tactical Urbanism (20 comments)
- Lovecraft, Baby, Love Craftby Kevin Somers, published May 23, 2013 in Entertainment and Sports (0 comments)
- We Need to Remember the Case for LRTby Ryan McGreal, published May 21, 2013 in Special Report: Light Rail (16 comments)
- The Benefits of Urban Chicken and Bee Pilot Projects at Community Gardensby Joseph Sneep, published May 18, 2013 in Commentary (12 comments)
- Public Works Committee Rejects Bus Lane Pilot Projectby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Special Report: Light Rail (32 comments)
- Focus on Cycling Infrastructure Before Enforcementby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (5 comments)
- Baranga's On the Beach: This Ain't No Beach-Side Hutby Margaret Lindsay Holton, published May 16, 2013 in Reviews (11 comments)
- NYC Redesigns its Streets for Safety, Vitality and Diverse Useby Ryan McGreal, published May 13, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (19 comments)
- Ghost Crosswalks Haunt Hamilton Intersectionsby Undustrial, published May 12, 2013 in Special Report: Walkable Streets (19 comments)
- Public Meeting with New Horizon Regarding City Square Phase 3by Kelly Foyle and Simon Kiss, published May 12, 2013 in Commentary (10 comments)
- Yes We Cannon - Bike Lanes 2015by Justin Jones, published May 10, 2013 in Special Report: Cycling (29 comments)
Article Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
- Ken Cowan Concert Organist Performance - May 24, 2013, at St. Paul's Presbyterian Church, 70 James St. S. @ Jackson St. Hamilton, Ontario
- 23 Upcoming Events...
Recent Blog Entries
- A Trip Down Highway 6by Ryan McGreal, published May 21, 2013 in Transportation (20 comments)
- 83-Year-Old Pedestrian Struck at Upper Gage and Mohawkby Ryan McGreal, published May 16, 2013 in Transportation (8 comments)
- Still Struggling to Make Sense of City Policy on Crosswalksby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 14, 2013 in Transportation (14 comments)
- Tactical Urbanism and the Judgment of Hart Solomonby Nicholas Kevlahan, published May 13, 2013 in Transportation (8 comments)
- A Poem in Julyby Shekar Chandrashekar, published May 12, 2013 in Arts (1 comment)
- Tactical Urbanism Crackdown in Spacingby Ryan McGreal, published May 10, 2013 in Activism (1 comment)
- Hamilton Sustainability Professionals Network Launch Eventby Justin Jones, published May 09, 2013 in Sustainability (0 comments)
- 20 Jackson Demolition Rumour is Just a Rumour - For Nowby Ryan McGreal, published May 09, 2013 in Revitalization (11 comments)
- Staircase Minor Variance Application to Waive Parking Requirementby RTH Staff, published May 08, 2013 in Activism (4 comments)
- Merulla Motion Calls for Integrity Commissioner to Investigate Mayor Bratinaby Ryan McGreal, published May 07, 2013 in Politics (8 comments)
- Letter: In Defence of Ontario Port Landsby Letter to the Editor, published May 07, 2013 in Revitalization (0 comments)
- Mayor Bratina Recuses Himself from Mayors' Vote on Big Move Revenue Toolsby Ryan McGreal, published May 07, 2013 in Light Rail (4 comments)
Blog Archives
By Councillor Brad Clark (anonymous)
Posted September 01, 2011 at 23:56:45
Hi Ryan and RTH participants,
I was asked to comment on the debate regarding the remediation costs of the West Harbour. But first, let me congratulate Mr. Shaker on a well written and timely article. Personally, I am concerned that the Mayor mentioned, in passing, that certain developers are seeing an opportunity to secure these lands. I have no doubt! I am also sure that they want these lands at rock bottom prices. I cannot support abandoning this community to the wishes of a few developers. The land was purchased with the intent of providing some community and sporting amenities. The City must honour our commitment!
The wide variances of the remediation costs is due to the province's rules regarding soil remediation. The City or landowner is required to file a " Record of Site Condition (RSC)", part of the EPA, Regulation 153/04. This regulation requires a Part I and II Environmental Assessment and site specific risk assessments. This simply means that any clean-up depends on the level of contamination and the lands final use. For example, if future use was to be another industry the requisite clean up would likely be less extensive and costly than if the end use was going to be residential.
In this case, the proposed clean-up for the West Harbour stadium was the least expensive with a site specific risk assessment that would mean capping the site for approx $3-5 million. In essence, the proponent would be sealing the contamination in and minimizing the potential migration of surface water through any contaminants to the ground water. The higher estimate was based on a dig and dump, where the contaminated soil would be excavated, rendered inert and dumped in a landfill, $20-$35 million.
That being said, any argument that we cannot use the West Harbour for the velodrome because the remediation would be too expensive is specious. Since, the City now owns the West Harbour lands, we are NOW responsible for the clean-up costs regardless of any Velodrome decision.
I hope this helps...
Brad
Councillor Brad Clark
Ward 9
Office 905 546-2703
cell 906 973-6937
Reply | Permalink | Context