Comment 74469

By highwater (registered) | Posted February 16, 2012 at 09:11:11 in reply to Comment 74411

Ok. I really want to vomit now. This $28m in deferred maintenance keeps coming up as the trigger for the consolidation 'discussions' that have lead us to the point of destroying a beautiful landmark building, and a key public institution fleeing the lower city.

This $28m figure was generated by a ReCapp audit. To say that this figure is highly dubious is an understatement.

When I wrote my article yesterday, I characterized this number as 'one of' the chief rationales. I am getting the increasingly sickening feeling that it may in fact be 'the' rationale. It certainly seems to be the key issue that precipitated this entire mess. If that's the case, this is nothing short of a scandal.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds