Special Report: Light Rail

That Non-Story About Catenary Poles in LRT Renderings

For a better sense of what we might expect along Hamilton's urban LRT corridor, here is a recent photograph of the Spadina LRT in Toronto.

By Ryan McGreal
Published November 07, 2016

One of the delegations at the October 25, 2016 fustercluck of a General Issues Committee meeting was a comparison between photos of the Waterloo Region Light Rail Transit (LRT) line, which is under construction, and renderings of the Hamilton LRT line, which is still being designed.

The delegate, Roger Stermann, who is opposed to the LRT line, argued that the renderings are misleading because they do not show the poles that will hold up the catenary wire system providing electrical power to the LRT vehicles.

His grievance has been given an airing in today's Spectator column by Andrews Dreschel.

Back in early September, I contacted the City's LRT office to ask about how the overhead system will be suspended. Kelly Anderson, communications manager for the LRT office, confirmed in an email reply that detailed design decisions had not been made yet. In a follow-up email, Anderson wrote:

Design decisions on what the poles and wires look like will be made during the procurement phase of the project [in 2018], but the Metrolinx Design Excellence standards indicate that they should be as visually unobtrusive as possible.

In other words, it's too soon to know whether our system will end up looking more like the specific segment of Waterloo that Stermann photographed.

It's important to note that the photos of Waterloo were taken on a suburban section of the corridor, not a section running through an urban city street.

Each local context is different and the design for each segment will vary based on what makes the most sense in that local context.

I would be very surprised to see the same wire suspension system used along every part of Hamilton's LRT - especially between the east-west line and the north-south line.

For a better sense of what we might expect along Hamilton's more urban LRT corridor, here is a recent photograph I took of a similar system:

Spadina LRT vehicle (RTH file photo)
Spadina LRT vehicle (RTH file photo)

The Spadina LRT is very similar to how LRT will run along the east-west route in Hamilton. It uses Bombardier Flexity Outlook vehicles, which is also planned for Hamilton, and runs in a dedicated right-of-way down the centre of the street, again just like Hamilton.

It doesn't have stations, but it has all-doors boarding at stops to approximate the fast loading of an LRT station.

You will note that the view is not characterized by obtrusive steel poles towering over the street.

You will also note that the presence of this LRT system has not driven away residents, businesses, offices or investment.

Quite the opposite: Spadina has transformed over the past couple of decades from a run-down district of boarded-up buildings into one of the most dense and desirable corridors in the city.

Naturally, when the City of Toronto implemented the King-Spadina Secondary Plan, a land-use plan that emphasizes urban built form, mixed use, density, and a transportation system that puts walking and transit first, critics of the plan predicted that it would be a failure because it did not put cars first.

That, too, is eerily similar to the debate in Hamilton, where a small rearguard of LRT critics, afraid of change and cynical about whether Hamilton deserves nice things, predicts that our LRT will be a failure because it is a dramatic change from the status quo.

Ryan McGreal, the editor of Raise the Hammer, lives in Hamilton with his family and works as a programmer, writer and consultant. Ryan volunteers with Hamilton Light Rail, a citizen group dedicated to bringing light rail transit to Hamilton. Ryan wrote a city affairs column in Hamilton Magazine, and several of his articles have been published in the Hamilton Spectator. His articles have also been published in The Walrus, HuffPost and Behind the Numbers. He maintains a personal website, has been known to share passing thoughts on Twitter and Facebook, and posts the occasional cat photo on Instagram.


View Comments: Nested | Flat

Read Comments

[ - ]

By ergopepsi (registered) | Posted November 07, 2016 at 14:55:20

I've noticed a few click-bait LRT stories in the Spec lately but this one, hopefully, was at the bottom of the barrel.

Permalink | Context

By blatchdk (registered) | Posted November 07, 2016 at 15:44:17 in reply to Comment 120419

I think it's partly because they keep getting criticized for posting "too many" pro LRT stories. Either way, I would appreciate it if their Anti-LRT stories had a little bit more fact-checking and outside references (beyond he-said/she-said)

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By JasonL (registered) | Posted November 07, 2016 at 17:43:59

not sure where the bottom of the barrel is for the Spec. Probably not today though.

Yea, let's talk about visual pollution from folks who never met a piece of greenspace they didn't dream of paving over for cars.

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By mdrejhon (registered) - website | Posted November 07, 2016 at 23:06:08

I have witnessed the transition of Toronto's TTC Spadina street from a traditional streetcar route to a somewhat more-modern LRT. New streetcars are based on modern LRT vehicles now, and Spadina is already its right-of way. And Spadina is now 100% new-streetcars, turning it into a defacto preview of other LRTs. However, some differennces:

-- It has older traffic priority, using very sub-optimal timings and manually triggered rather than GPS triggered. In many cases this results in streetcars stopping twice -- once at a red light, then again at the far-side stop. For efficient far-side platform operation, you want a reliable well-tuned traffic priority system.

-- TTC enabled the all-door boarding experience with the new streetcars, but it's not currently (yet) level boarding, subway style. They still use a fold-out ramp for wheelchairs. Once all of Toronto's streetcar network is 100% new streetcars, it is theoretically possible to later rebuild all streetcar stops as real level-boarding stations.

-- It is still using trollypole rather than pantograph operation. Pantographs are more slip-proof and is able to provide more power/more traction in many cases, as thicker wires are often used with pantographs. The new streetcars have pantograph capability, so TTC can upgrade eventually.

-- In many sections of TTC Spadina streetcar route, stop spacing is not currently optimal for subway-speed experience.

-- New streetcars are unidirectional. They don't have driver cabs on both ends, and they don't have doors on both sides. The LRVs we will get, will be double-ended and can change ends -- no turning loop needed for Hamilton LRT!

However, Spadina is most certainly one of TTC's most attractive streetcar routes, given its more modern elements to a very legacy/100+ year old system that's incrementally migrating to an LRT.

With these caveats above, it is indeed that Spadina's TTC streetcar route, is the closest thing to an operating LRT in Ontario. However, it is not a clean-sheet modern flexible LRT system design like ION LRT, Hamiltonn LRT, and Eglinton Crosstown LRT.

Comment edited by mdrejhon on 2016-11-07 23:09:12

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By DowntownInHamilton (registered) | Posted November 08, 2016 at 05:54:45

How is this news?

Is there some thought that there is a pro-LRT conspiracy to hide power lines? Why does Dreschel write stuff like this?

Permalink | Context

[ - ]

By notlloyd (registered) - website | Posted November 19, 2016 at 08:42:16

"Public Transit! Public Power!" Oh no agenda here. Problems with renderings are just in the imagination of the complainers. Double speak is just a co-incidence.

Permalink | Context

View Comments: Nested | Flat

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to comment.

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools