Comment 119331

By highwater (registered) | Posted June 15, 2016 at 11:22:14 in reply to Comment 119261

Sorry, that's pure revisionism. The main complaint about Eisenberger's position was that he was pro-LRT by stealth and the citizens' panel would be rigged to achieve his desired outcome, so it's rather rich for opponents to come back now and try to claim Eisenberger was neutral on LRT.

Of course even if it were true that he was neutral, it would simply mean that the number of people either for or meh about LRT still outnumbers the number of people against. Either way, anti-LRT loses.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools