Comment 119913

By Pxtl (registered) - website | Posted August 30, 2016 at 09:46:59 in reply to Comment 119883

Agreed. That's my biggest worry about this project - the Upper James connection is a very important one, and it sounds like they're making a bad compromise on it. The document they released was extremely sparse on details about that connection, so hopefully that one they're still figuring out. I'm sure the big worry with using the obvious crossing right at the split is the speed of traffic - there used to be a crossing there and it's been closed off. But imho, trying to make that crossing work would be the best option.

Observe:

the gap

and a desire path leading up to that barrier!

the path

Comment edited by Pxtl on 2016-08-30 09:47:31

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds