Comment 119928

By Pxtl (registered) - website | Posted August 30, 2016 at 16:00:22 in reply to Comment 119927

Exactly. Ideally we'd see something similar to the (admittedly mediocre) treatment they gave the King/403 Eastbound ramp crossing. Put some knockdown sticks and extend the white line so the ramp beings further away from the crossing, and then draw the crosswalk lines there. Give drivers time to commit to the W5 ramp and to clearly delineate the space, and then put the crossing in the natural space.

Also, since the Claremont is now going to be 2 lanes upbound for much of its length, the span from the fork to the proper beginning of Upper James could be similarly 2 lanes... which means bike lane up a short span of claremont/upper james!

In Q&D picture:

quick and dirty embiggen

Comment edited by Pxtl on 2016-08-30 16:01:24

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds