Comment 15825

By peter (anonymous) | Posted December 21, 2007 at 10:29:58

^is that a critique of the article? if so, you might want to expand upon it.

i hate to say it but i never really thought about the upper james rapid transit line in those terms. it's certainly food for thought. that said, if the city were interested in transforming upper james into a densely populated residential area then brt would be a good start. not sure if that's their intention, though.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds