Comment 26512

By A Smith (anonymous) | Posted September 10, 2008 at 23:26:38

Scientist, science is not nature, it is a system designed by men to try and understand nature. As a result, science is only as good as the results it actually predicts.

So far the predictions made by the global warming crowd are failing to jive with reality. This summer is a great example of how off base these models are proving to be. Had any of the models predicted that this summer would be as cold as it was, then that would have added to the credibility of the scientists involved, but they didn't, and now they look stupid.

In business, people that fail to predict trends go out of business, and the same should be true of climate scientists.

This past winter was also much colder than average, with thickening arctic ice, and record snowfalls over the northern hemisphere.

Yet, the Global Warming crowd want us to accept that no matter what reality is telling us, it's the computer models that we need to base our decisions on. Why? Why should I believe someone who can't even predict the short term changes in the climate, let alone a few years out?

If you want to base your decisions on some perverted guilty conscience about white men screwing up the earth, that is your choice. I will live in a more pragmatic fashion, and do what is best for my own personal lifestyle, and let you worry about it for me.

Make sure you keep me informed if your models actually begin to work.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds