Raise the Hammer

so unless we have more then 307,000 proven deaths from fluoride we must debate auto safety. Point taken on the relative numbers and amount of consern. I am a very high water user and my sever joint pain problems drasticly decreased after not drinking the city water. I hope I am allowed to be concerned. Unless I can see some researcher that shows ingested fluoride has a measurable ability to reduce cavities it does seem even more foolish to even have to discuss . Where is this motherload of science that shows topical at 1ppm down your throat as the ingested preeruptive theory is now known invalid. See Yoder K.M. at pub med 2997 Indiana had only 17% of dental professionals that understood the new theory of posteruptive topical effect. Blind faith in ingested preeruptive is mentioned as outdated theory. fluoridealert.org has ingested fluoride article with over 20 researchers claiming topical not ingested in measurable effect. CDC in 1999 and 2001 MMWR mentions predominate effect topical. Brits in august claimed less then 1000ppm toothpaste is too weak to have much benefit for young kids. If 1000ppm is too weak how does 1ppm work?
Why must anyone have to pay to have a choice to not receive a medical treatment. They clearly state the disease of dental caries is treated by fluoridation. Even the FDA in 1979 removed fluoride from a nutrient or probable nutrient list after 3 lawsuits lost. The ADA also stated no claim of benefit can be made for fluoride bottled water for kids under 12 months. Sort of like the ADA and CDC infant formula caution from 2006 but others did this far earlier. Should we go the next step after the 1993 NTP unusually susceptable warnings. Most everyone but no promised follow up yet. Lets see how Osmunson does in Washington if fluorides are poisons or legend drugs with proper control of dose and patients needs.