Comment 29359

By JonC (registered) | Posted March 05, 2009 at 17:30:13

For reference, my North Korea example was tongue in cheek. Military expenditures being so high, that the remainder of government spending has to be low. Wasted joke.

"whoever is in office when the economy goes either up or down should get the credit or the blame"

Why blame Rae and not Mulroney? Because it suits your ideological view point.

Economic events are set into advance years and decades in advance. I know you don't get "things" but that's how it is.

When you compare the 90s to this decade, you are completely clueless that the wealth of the 90s and the early part of this year was created due to deregulation leading to inflated values. That unrealistic surge in value is directly responsible for the current economic crisis.

Comparing your hare-brained ideas (or any ideas about social sciences) to physics is idiotic. Hard sciences are verifiable and can be reduced to simple phenomena. Social phenomena (and economics is a social phenomena) can't. That you actually consider that you have the solution to every country's economic woes would be the stupidest thing you've said yet (if it wasn't for you implying God was extracting divine retribution on Hamilton and that the extension of the GO train into Hamilton was also directly responsible for closing of Stelco).

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds