Comment 52157

By mrjanitor (registered) | Posted November 24, 2010 at 16:53:48


Reading Comprehension FAIL.

What I wrote: Follow your methodology you are a filthy politico whore and should be spit on endlessly. That's most likely far from the truth is it not?

Why would you answer: I don't mind your verbal spitting (says more about you than me)

Your original post states Ryan is advocating LRT for personal gain. My point is that if you apply your logic to yourself then the conclusion is that you only ran for mayor to rob the taxpayer's bank for yourself and therefor you are filthy politico whore that deserves to be spit on. I then say, (once again)," That's most likely far from the truth is it not?" From this I obviously mean that it is ridiculous to reduce your motives to so base a drive, so why would you reduce Ryan's motives to so base a drive? Make sense now?

Comment edited by mrjanitor on 2010-11-24 16:03:02

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools