Comment 68072

By revbrian11 (registered) | Posted August 16, 2011 at 17:02:41

The point, regarding the need for an approved plan to ensure that yet another vacant lot is not left, is a very good point indeed. I don't know and would appreciate being enlightened - did the demolisher in this case have an approved site plan for a replacement structure? Beyond that concern, it is just so disheartening that a perfectly good, handsome structure such as the Federal Building could not have been preserved and put to good use as part of whatever was the proposed use for the property.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds