Comment 68840

By Mr. Meister (anonymous) | Posted September 01, 2011 at 05:22:59 in reply to Comment 68815

I am sure there are a variety of reasons. If however you are trying to pin the increase business on two way streets then why is John North in just about the same state it was in pre two way conversion? There is little if any evidence to show the changes on James North are anything other than co-incidental to the two way conversion. The two streets were converted at the same time, one experienced change the other did not. How can you attribute the change on the one to the conversion?

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds