Comment 73850

By jacob (registered) | Posted February 07, 2012 at 15:12:12 in reply to Comment 73820

I'm not sure this is true. CN appealed against 'residential' zoning not residential uses. This is an important distinction. Residential is also allowed in many of the commercial and mixed use designations. If they appealed against pure residential in favour of a higher density commercial/ residential mix that would make sense to me. That in fact was required for mixed use to occur. To automatically assume the result would be no residential is not justified. I guess we will see tomorrow...

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds