Comment 74678

By DanJelly (registered) | Posted February 23, 2012 at 01:33:41 in reply to Comment 74666

Why did the 18 sheets not simply point back to the differenciation [sic] factor on the 'master'? Instead, over 3000 fields were affected across these 18 sheets, and the ranking was significantly different.

You'd think if this were just a simple error that somebody would have noticed before they were all turned into polished PDF's with maps and pictures and published online.

This also doesn't answer any of the other questions asked. Who selected the criteria? Who weighted them? Who scored the sites?

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools