Comment 80489

By Chevron (anonymous) | Posted September 05, 2012 at 14:23:54 in reply to Comment 80475

You could probably make a case for CT 5370049 because once you compensate for the 4-5 blocks devoted to surface parking, the the existing density (5,549) would likely climb sharply.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds