Comment 80600

By Pxtl (registered) - website | Posted September 06, 2012 at 11:02:38 in reply to Comment 80594

While this is a little severely worded, I have to agree with the basic point that family homes are simply not designed to be rental properties. They aren't rugged enough, they have maintenance issues that aren't appropriate for either a tenant or a landlord to deal with.

Shoving a square peg into a round hole is going to be expensive any way you slice it. It's going to be hard no matter what. But that doesn't mean the City should let you off the hook for the problems your rental properties are causing. If it's a bad business to be in, maybe you shouldn't be in it?

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds