Comment 82712

By SpaceMonkey (registered) | Posted November 09, 2012 at 17:36:40

Has anyone else considered the flawed logic in the blog entry?

The author asks why anyone would call to complain about a lane closure that doesn't affect traffic. He then assumes.. well actually he doesn't only assume, he states as a fact that this is evidence that driver's feel entitlement. Should I then assume that the author is a selfish person if he can not fathom the idea that people might be thinking of others when they voice their concerns?

The author then goes on to contradict them self. At first the complaints are the biggest evidence that drivers feel entitled and then they suggest that drivers may feel entitled.

Perhaps the drivers are complaining because they have come close to hitting a cyclist, or a cyclist hitting them. Who knows. What I do know is that some people on RTH will use just about any piece of information they can find to spin and make assumptions about in order to substantiate their own outlook.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds