Comment 86291

By RightSaidFred (registered) | Posted February 14, 2013 at 12:32:56

NIMBY.

At the risk of a multitude of downvotes it seems most of the 'no' side seems fine with it staying in Flamboro (correct me if I am wrong), yet most of the 'no' side claims to have a higher social responsibilty to the downtrodden in the core who would be vunerable to this. To me, you can't have it both ways. If it is morally unacceptable to you then you should be voicing your opinion to close down Flamboro completely and allow NO casino anywhere within our city limits. Period. Since this doesn't seem to be the case it seems to be a case of NIMBYism dressed up as social activism to me.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds