There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?
Recent Articles
- Justice for Indigenous Peoples is Long Overdueby Ryan McGreal, published June 30, 2021 in Commentary
(0 comments)
- Third-Party Election Advertising Ban About Silencing Workersby Chantal Mancini, published June 29, 2021 in Politics
(0 comments)
- Did Doug Ford Test the 'Great Barrington Declaration' on Ontarians?by Ryan McGreal, published June 29, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- An Update on Raise the Hammerby Ryan McGreal, published June 28, 2021 in Site Notes
(0 comments)
- Nestlé Selling North American Water Bottling to an Private Equity Firmby Doreen Nicoll, published February 23, 2021 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- Jolley Old Sam Lawrenceby Sean Burak, published February 19, 2021 in Special Report: Cycling
(0 comments)
- Right-Wing Extremism is a Driving Force in Modern Conservatismby Ryan McGreal, published February 18, 2021 in Special Report: Extremism
(0 comments)
- Municipalities Need to Unite against Ford's Firehose of Land Use Changesby Michelle Silverton, published February 16, 2021 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Challenging Doug Ford's Pandemic Narrativeby Ryan McGreal, published January 25, 2021 in Special Report: COVID-19
(1 comment)
- The Year 2020 Has Been a Wakeup Callby Michael Nabert, published December 31, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- The COVID-19 Marshmallow Experimentby Ryan McGreal, published December 22, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- All I Want for Christmas, 2020by Kevin Somers, published December 21, 2020 in Entertainment and Sports
(1 comment)
- Hamilton Shelters Remarkably COVID-19 Free Thanks to Innovative Testing Programby Jason Allen, published December 21, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
- Province Rams Through Glass Factory in Stratfordby Doreen Nicoll, published December 21, 2020 in Healing Gaia
(0 comments)
- We Can Prevent Traffic Deaths if We Make Safety a Real Priorityby Ryan McGreal, published December 08, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(5 comments)
- These Aren't 'Accidents', These Are Resultsby Tom Flood, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report: Walkable Streets
(1 comment)
- Conservation Conundrumby Paul Weinberg, published December 04, 2020 in Special Report
(0 comments)
- Defund Police Protest Threatens Fragile Ruling Classby Cameron Kroetsch, published December 03, 2020 in Special Report: Anti-Racism
(2 comments)
- Measuring the Potential of Biogas to Reduce GHG Emissionsby John Loukidelis and Thomas Cassidy, published November 23, 2020 in Special Report: Climate Change
(0 comments)
- Ontario Squanders Early Pandemic Sacrificeby Ryan McGreal, published November 18, 2020 in Special Report: COVID-19
(0 comments)
Article Archives
Blog Archives
Site Tools
Feeds
By bikehounds (anonymous) | Posted June 11, 2013 at 08:40:00 in reply to Comment 89474
The point is, Hamilton does not need that many square metres of vehicular travel lanes. We can't afford them. Why do we have to talk about that 6200 number as if it's written in stone? We can eliminate some lanes. The cost to count cars and reduce the lanes on streets that are overbuilt is nothing compared to the ongoing "rehabilitation" costs that are already completely out of control. We built through-streets wider than 400 series highways back when there was real vehicular traffic in this city, with tens of thousands of daily commuters working in the North end, and a dream of even more people and cars. That era is over, but we've maintained a death grip on every possible lane, offering them up to trucking companies and through traffic to wear away at them at our cost. This unsustainable attitude will sink this city.
I don't know the exact cost of shutting lanes down but I'm certain it's cheaper than resurfacing them every 10 years. Imagine giving some of that road right-of-way back to the property owners. Picture Victoria Ave redesigned to accommodate the number of cars it actually carries - with one lane in each direction, a centre turn lane and maybe even a bike lane - and a few feet left over to give back to the front yards of the majestic houses that line that street. The result would be a street that people want to live on. Higher property values. More taxes. And getting around would be easier, because now you have an additional southbound option. Now multiply that effect by every overbuilt street in the city. How much would it cost to do this? Is the payoff worth it?
The problem is, without anyone with guts to ask these questions within the city, we may never find out the costs and benefits of this approach. We just keep repaving them as-is and crossing our fingers that someone or something will rescue us from the suffocating deficit in the roads budget. I'd like to hear the public works and councillors' ideas of how we are ever going to catch up on the rehabilitation backlog. It's basically impossible at this point. This year we are adding another 100 million to the backlog, AND we are building 25 million worth of NEW ROADS, guaranteed to come back and bite us in the ass later. They just announced an $18 million road road atop the RHVP hill, and there are dozens of roads currently on the "future widenings" list. It's insanity.
Permalink | Context