Comment 90975

By bikehounds (anonymous) | Posted August 16, 2013 at 12:45:09

Contrast this to the gore park properties...

They were functioning and tenanted. Out of the blue, the owners floated a preliminary sketch of an idea they had for development. Then they emptied the buildings and took the storefronts off. Now the buildings generate zero revenue, contribute nothing to the street, and the owners claim that they can't afford to keep them anymore - because they are empty.

Those tenants should not have been given notice until WB had financing, permits, variances, pre-sales, contractors, etc. lined up.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds