Comment 91252

By kevlahan (registered) | Posted August 22, 2013 at 15:47:20 in reply to Comment 91248

This part is especially sad:

"As pedestrians are the more vulnerable road user, they must take extra care to ensure that all approaching drivers have seen them and have or will be able to stop safely, before ocnsidering [sic] entering the roadway."

i.e. on the road, unlike most other situations in life, the onus is on the most vulnerable to ensure they take extra care. In other words, might makes right! They even make it seem like a general principle: when two road users are interacting (e.g. an 18-wheeler and a minivan or a cyclist and a motorist) the most vulnerable "must" be the one to take extra care to avoid being squished. Note that they don't say it is prudent for the vulnerable road user to take the extra care , they write as if it is a duty.

A more humane system would say the opposite "as motorists are the less vulnerable road users, they must take extra care to ensure they have seen and yield to crossing pedestrians". And, strangely enough, that is precisely what the Highway Traffic Act actually says!

Comment edited by kevlahan on 2013-08-22 15:51:11

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds