Comment 31637

By JonC (registered) | Posted June 10, 2009 at 15:49:15

On Ryan's comment. Points 1 and 4 are related. If the increase in value is greater than the property tax then the vacant lot/empty building acts as a (low risk) investment.
I get the reason for reduced taxes on vacant property (allows time to renovate/repair). But there should be a time limit implemented on the length of time the reduced rate should be held.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools