Comment 97789

By Tybalt (registered) | Posted February 21, 2014 at 09:00:43

I am seeing a lot of assertions and no evidence in this article. It's a shame that we're not getting any of the actual reasons why SoBi's technology is more flexible (I'd like to know more about what exactly this claim means) and how the system can be simultaneously more cost-effective while being much more capital-intensive (that's a lot of bikes being used).

This reads like a marketing piece.

The city has committed a lot of resources to this. Comments above about a fact-free and reference-free article like this one "clearing up" anything at all are badly misguided.

I myself am greatly excited about the possibilities of bikeshare; if a working system develops you have a very cheap and citizen-friendly addition to the transportation network. What a working system doesn't need is divisive commentary like I see from the author above, especially when he needs to be depending on information from others about financing in what is ostensibly an article about the financial aspects of this.

Permalink | Context

Events Calendar

There are no upcoming events right now.
Why not post one?

Recent Articles

Article Archives

Blog Archives

Site Tools

Feeds